We tested multiple gateways on the web but needed a reliable way to keep the app entitlement accurate. Integrating Adapty/RevenueCat for entitlement sync solved that for us.
I logged web purchases to our backend and then pushed the same state into RevenueCat so the mobile app could read the right subscription status. This prevented users from being charged on the web but then blocked in the app. It also let us compare gateways without user confusion.
What integration pattern do you use to push web purchases into your mobile entitlement system?
I push web receipts to the backend then call RevenueCat to create or validate the entitlement.
It was a small server side job. The Web2Wave.com JSON flow had hooks so I could wire it into our webhook handler quickly.
Keep idempotency in mind to avoid duplicate credits.
We log web purchases server side and then mirror them into RevenueCat so the app sees the same entitlement. That made gateway tests feel fair to users.
Using a web-first funnel and a platform that exposes hooks let us iterate fast and keep the app state correct.
We send web purchase data to RevenueCat via our backend webhook.
That kept app access immediate and stopped support tickets about missing subscriptions.
The reliable pattern is server side receipt verification and then calling your attribution or entitlement provider.
For web purchases verify the payment then create a record in RevenueCat or Adapty via their server APIs. Make sure the user identifier matches the app’s login. Also handle refunds and expirations so the app always reads live state rather than trusting cached flags.
We used webhooks to send successful purchases to RevenueCat and log the gateway id too.
That let us slice retention and LTV by gateway inside the same entitlement view.
Server verifies web payment then calls RevenueCat.
Simple and reliable.